Loading…
Joint Arbitrage and Operating Reserve Scheduling of Energy Storage Through Optimal Adaptive Allocation of the State of Charge
Energy storage can become one of the portfolio solutions in modern power systems by increasing the grid's resilience. The intensive capital cost of storage, however, is one of the most important barriers to its proliferation. To alleviate the impact of its sizable capital expenditure, exploitin...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on sustainable energy 2019-10, Vol.10 (4), p.1705-1717 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Energy storage can become one of the portfolio solutions in modern power systems by increasing the grid's resilience. The intensive capital cost of storage, however, is one of the most important barriers to its proliferation. To alleviate the impact of its sizable capital expenditure, exploiting the full benefit of storage should be targeted through joint applications. The economic efficiency of jointly scheduled storage, however, is seriously undermined if its capacity is not optimally allocated for each application. This paper unveils a new storage scheduling algorithm for the joint arbitrage and operating reserve (OPR) as merchant functions. The optimization slack variables are employed as fictitious capacities to adapt the upper and lower bounds of the state of charge (SOC). The storage SOC is, then, optimally allocated for the arbitrage and OPR. Via an adaptive penalizing mechanism and soft constraints, OPR signals are incorporated into the optimization process. Anew index is formulated to quantify the storage participation toward OPR. Market price modulation factors are presented for financial analysis of the storage contribution to the OPR market. Numerical studies are conducted over the storage operation using historical market data to validate the efficacy of the proposed model. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1949-3029 1949-3037 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2869882 |