Loading…
Free-hand ultrasound scanning approaches for volume quantification of the mouse heart left ventricle
Two approaches for free-hand motion tracking that enable volumetric quantification of the murine heart were investigated. One approach used an instrumented, multijointed articulated arm attached to a 14 MHz ultrasound transducer array. A second approach used an E-beam transducer - a modified linear...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2007-05, Vol.54 (5), p.966-977 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Two approaches for free-hand motion tracking that enable volumetric quantification of the murine heart were investigated. One approach used an instrumented, multijointed articulated arm attached to a 14 MHz ultrasound transducer array. A second approach used an E-beam transducer - a modified linear transducer array containing a main imaging array adjacent to three perpendicular tracking arrays. Motion between successive B-mode image frames was computed by tracking image speckle in each tracking array. Both tracking systems produced accurate results in a phantom validation study (4.50% error and 3.75% error for estimates derived using the articulated arm and E-beam tracking techniques, respectively). The tracking approaches also were tested in vivo on three mice. Results were compared to values obtained by mounting each mouse on a micromanipulator, adjusting its position by 0-5-mm increments, and acquiring B-mode images using a high-resolution ultrasound scanner. Left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) estimates differed from values obtained using the high-resolution scanner by a mean error of 18.2% and 2.60% for eight scans conducted on each of two mice using the articulated arm, and a mean error of 13.6%, 6.53%, and 12.58% for eight scans conducted on each of three mice using the E-beam |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0885-3010 1525-8955 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TUFFC.2007.342 |