Loading…

Solvent‐tuning the collapse and helix formation time scales of λ 6‐85

The λ 6‐85 * pseudo‐wild type of lambda repressor fragment is a fast two‐state folder ( k f ≈ 35 μsec −1 at 58°C). Previously, highly stable λ 6‐85 * mutants with k f > 30 μsec −1 have been engineered to fold nearly or fully downhill. Stabilization of the native state by solvent tuning might also...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Protein science 2006-11, Vol.15 (11), p.2596-2604
Main Authors: Dumont, Charles, Matsumura, Yoshitaka, Kim, Seung Joong, Li, Jinsong, Kondrashkina, Elena, Kihara, Hiroshi, Gruebele, Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The λ 6‐85 * pseudo‐wild type of lambda repressor fragment is a fast two‐state folder ( k f ≈ 35 μsec −1 at 58°C). Previously, highly stable λ 6‐85 * mutants with k f > 30 μsec −1 have been engineered to fold nearly or fully downhill. Stabilization of the native state by solvent tuning might also tune λ 6‐85 * away from two‐state folding. We test this prediction by examining the folding thermodynamics and kinetics of λ 6‐85 * in a stabilizing solvent, 45% by weight aqueous ethylene glycol at −28°C. Detection of kinetics by circular dichroism at 222 nm (sensitive to helix content) and small angle X‐ray scattering (measuring the radius of gyration) shows that refolding from guanidine hydrochloride denatured conditions exhibits very different time scales for collapse and secondary structure formation: the two processes become decoupled. Collapse remains a low‐barrier activated process, while the fastest of several secondary structure formation time scales approaches the downhill folding limit. Two‐state folding of λ 6‐85 * is not a robust process.
ISSN:0961-8368
1469-896X
DOI:10.1110/ps.062257406