A Comparative In Vitro Study of Materials for Provisional Restorations Manufactured With Additive (3Dprinting), Subtractive (Milling), and Conventional Techniques

Objective To compare the mechanical, chemical, and surface properties of three materials used for provisional restorations, manufactured with additive (3D‐printing), subtractive (milling), and conventional techniques. Materials and Methods Three material groups were tested: (a) GC TempPRINT, (3D‐pri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2025-08, Vol.37 (8), p.2011-2020
Main Authors: Pallis, Dimitrios, Pachiou, Aspasia, Dimitriadi, Maria, Sykaras, Nikitas, Kourtis, Stefanos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
3D‐printing
Composite Resins - chemistry
Computer-Aided Design
Dental Materials - chemistry
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Restoration, Temporary
digital dentistry
Flexural Strength
Hardness
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Materials Testing
milling
Printing, Three-Dimensional
self‐curing provisional restorative materials
Statistical analysis
Surface Properties
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!