Loading…

Testing for no effect in regression problems: A permutation approach

Often the question arises whether can be predicted based on using a certain model. Especially for highly flexible models such as neural networks one may ask whether a seemingly good prediction is actually better than fitting pure noise or whether it has to be attributed to the flexibility of the mod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Statistica Neerlandica 2024-06
Main Authors: Ciszewski, Michał G., Söhl, Jakob, Leenen, Ton, van Trigt, Bart, Jongbloed, Geurt
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Often the question arises whether can be predicted based on using a certain model. Especially for highly flexible models such as neural networks one may ask whether a seemingly good prediction is actually better than fitting pure noise or whether it has to be attributed to the flexibility of the model. This paper proposes a rigorous permutation test to assess whether the prediction is better than the prediction of pure noise. The test avoids any sample splitting and is based instead on generating new pairings of . It introduces a new formulation of the null hypothesis and rigorous justification for the test, which distinguishes it from the previous literature. The theoretical findings are applied both to simulated data and to sensor data of tennis serves in an experimental context. The simulation study underscores how the available information affects the test. It shows that the less informative the predictors, the lower the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis of fitting pure noise and emphasizes that detecting weaker dependence between variables requires a sufficient sample size.
ISSN:0039-0402
1467-9574
DOI:10.1111/stan.12346