Loading…
Anticoncentration for subgraph statistics
Consider integers k,ℓ such that 0⩽ℓ⩽k2. Given a large graph G, what is the fraction of k‐vertex subsets of G which span exactly ℓ edges? When G is empty or complete, and ℓ is zero or k2, this fraction can be exactly 1. On the other hand, if ℓ is far from these extreme values, one might expect that t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the London Mathematical Society 2019-06, Vol.99 (3), p.757-777 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Consider integers k,ℓ such that 0⩽ℓ⩽k2. Given a large graph G, what is the fraction of k‐vertex subsets of G which span exactly ℓ edges? When G is empty or complete, and ℓ is zero or k2, this fraction can be exactly 1. On the other hand, if ℓ is far from these extreme values, one might expect that this fraction is substantially smaller than 1. This was recently proved by Alon, Hefetz, Krivelevich, and Tyomkyn who initiated the systematic study of this question and proposed several natural conjectures.
Let ℓ∗=min{ℓ,k2−ℓ}. Our main result is that for any k and ℓ, the fraction of k‐vertex subsets that span ℓ edges is at most logO(1)(ℓ∗/k)k/ℓ∗, which is best‐possible up to the logarithmic factor. This improves on multiple results of Alon, Hefetz, Krivelevich, and Tyomkyn, and resolves one of their conjectures. In addition, we also make some first steps towards some analogous questions for hypergraphs.
Our proofs involve some Ramsey‐type arguments, and a number of different probabilistic tools, such as polynomial anticoncentration inequalities, hypercontractivity, and a coupling trick for random variables defined on a ‘slice’ of the Boolean hypercube. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0024-6107 1469-7750 |
DOI: | 10.1112/jlms.12192 |