Loading…

Comparative study of native oxide impacts on low energy doping processes

The impacts of the native oxides and the impurity loss mechanisms of low energy doping process for both p -type and n -type implants have been quantitatively studied using secondary ion mass spectrometry/angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy method. The low energy doping processes include...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of vacuum science & technology. B, Microelectronics and nanometer structures processing, measurement and phenomena Microelectronics and nanometer structures processing, measurement and phenomena, 2010-01, Vol.28 (1), p.C1C77-C1C83
Main Authors: Qin, Shu, McTeer, Allen, Zhuang, Kent, Morinville, Wendy, Lu, Shifeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The impacts of the native oxides and the impurity loss mechanisms of low energy doping process for both p -type and n -type implants have been quantitatively studied using secondary ion mass spectrometry/angle-resolved x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy method. The low energy doping processes include conventional beamline implant and plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII). It has been found that the native oxides play very significant roles on the low energy implants, especially for PIII due to its unique impurity profiles. The results show very different behaviors on p -type and n -type implants because of the Si O 2 ∕ Si interface segregation mechanisms. p -type (boron-based) doping loses more impurities into the native oxide, but n -type (arsenic-based) doping does not lose impurities. These results can be used to optimize the semiconductor processes such as implant, strip, clean, and thermal-annealing process.
ISSN:1071-1023
2166-2746
1520-8567
2166-2754
DOI:10.1116/1.3184522