Observations and analysis of wide piled foundations

• Published in: Canadian geotechnical journal 2019-03, Vol.56 (3), p.378-397
• Main Author: Fellenius, Bengt H
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Building foundations; Bulging; Case histories; Charge distribution; Charge transfer; Compression; Contact stresses; Distribution; Downdrag; Drag; Equivalence; groupes de pieux; Indoor environments; Load; Load distribution; Load distribution (forces); Mechanical properties; pieux; pile groups; Piles; piles raft; Pilings (Building); radeau de pieu; Rafting; Rafts; Rigidity; règlement; répartition de la charge; settlement; Soil; Soil layers; Soils; Stress concentration; Studies; Subsidence
• ISSN: 0008-3674; 1208-6010
• DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2018-0031

Available case histories on observations on full-scale piled rafts show that the settlement response to applied load can be modeled as that for an Equivalent Pier due to compression of the piles and the soil matrix plus that of an Equivalent Raft for compression of soil layers below the pile toe level. Interior piles engage the soil from the pile toe level upward in contrast to a single pile, which engages it from the ground downward. Piles and soil, combined as a pier, have strain compatibility, which determines the distribution of load between the piles, the contact stress, and the load-transfer movement of the piles. The responses between the interior and perimeter piles differ. Particularly so in non-subsiding and subsiding environment, because perimeter piles can be subjected to downdrag and drag forces, while neither downdrag nor drag force will affect the interior piles. In non-subsiding environment, it is advantageous to make perimeter piles shorter, while in subsiding environment perimeter piles best be longer. The load distribution across the raft is also governed by the degree of rigidity of the raft and by the difference in dishing at the pile toe level and in the dishing of the actual raft.