Loading…
Subquadratic Kernels for Implicit 3-H itting S et and 3-S et P acking Problems
We consider four well-studied NP-complete packing/covering problems on graphs: F eedback V ertex S et in T ournaments (FVST), C luster V ertex D eletion (CVD), T riangle P acking in T ournaments (TPT) and I nduced P 3 -P acking . For these four problems, kernels with O ( k 2 ) vertices have been kno...
Saved in:
Published in: | ACM transactions on algorithms 2019-01, Vol.15 (1), p.1-44 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We consider four well-studied NP-complete packing/covering problems on graphs: F
eedback
V
ertex
S
et in
T
ournaments
(FVST), C
luster
V
ertex
D
eletion
(CVD), T
riangle
P
acking in
T
ournaments
(TPT) and I
nduced
P
3
-P
acking
. For these four problems, kernels with
O
(
k
2
) vertices have been known for a long time. In fact, such kernels can be obtained by interpreting these problems as finding either a packing of
k
pairwise disjoint sets of size 3 (3-S
et
P
acking
) or a hitting set of size at most
k
for a family of sets of size at most 3 (3-H
itting
S
et
). In this article, we give the first kernels for FVST, CVD, TPT, and I
nduced
P
3
-P
acking
with a subquadratic number of vertices. Specifically, we obtain the following results.
• FVST admits a kernel with
O
(
k
3/2
) vertices.
• CVD admits a kernel with
O
(
k
5/3
) vertices.
• TPT admits a kernel with
O
(
k
3/2
) vertices.
• I
nduced
P
3
-P
acking
admits a kernel with
O
(
k
5/3
) vertices.
Our results resolve an open problem from WorKer 2010 on the existence of kernels with O(
k
2−ϵ
) vertices for FVST and CVD. All of our results are based on novel uses of old and new “expansion lemmas” and a weak form of crown decomposition where (i)
almost all
of the head is used by the solution (as opposed to
all
), (ii)
almost none
of the crown is used by the solution (as opposed to
none
), and (iii) if
H
is removed from
G
, then there is
almost no
interaction between the head and the rest (as opposed to
no
interaction at all). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1549-6325 1549-6333 |
DOI: | 10.1145/3293466 |