Loading…

Effects of Electrically Coupled Inhibitory Networks on Local Neuronal Responses to Intracortical Microstimulation

1 Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Cognitive Neurology, University Tübingen, Tübingen; and 2 Department of Clinical Neurobiology, University Hospital of Neurology, Heidelberg, Germany Submitted 4 November 2005; accepted in final form 15 May 2006 Using in vivo multielectrod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neurophysiology 2006-09, Vol.96 (3), p.1227-1236
Main Authors: Butovas, Sergejus, Hormuzdi, Sheriar G, Monyer, Hannah, Schwarz, Cornelius
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:1 Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Cognitive Neurology, University Tübingen, Tübingen; and 2 Department of Clinical Neurobiology, University Hospital of Neurology, Heidelberg, Germany Submitted 4 November 2005; accepted in final form 15 May 2006 Using in vivo multielectrode electrophysiology in mice, we investigated the underpinnings of a local, long-lasting firing rate suppression evoked by intracortical microstimulation. Synaptic inhibition contributes to this suppression as it was reduced by pharmacological blockade of -aminobutyric acid type B (GABA B ) receptors. Blockade of GABA B receptors also abolished the known sublinear addition of inhibitory response duration after repetitive electrical stimulation. Furthermore, evoked inhibition was weaker and longer in connexin 36 knockout (KO) mice that feature decoupled cortical inhibitory networks. In supragranular layers of KO mice even an unusually long excitatory response ( 50 ms) appeared that was never observed in wild-type (WT) mice. Furthermore, the spread and duration of very fast oscillations (>200 Hz) evoked by microstimulation at a short latency were strongly enhanced in KO mice. In the spatial domain, lack of connexin 36 unmasked a strong anisotropy of inhibitory spread. Although its reach along layers was almost the same as that in WT mice, the spread across cortical depth was severely hampered. In summary, the present data suggest that connexin 36–coupled networks significantly shape the electrically evoked cortical inhibitory response. Electrical coupling renders evoked cortical inhibition more precise and strong and ensures a uniform spread along the two cardinal axes of neocortical geometry. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. Schwarz, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Cognitive Neurology, University Tübingen, Otfried Müller Str. 27, 72076 Tübingen, Germany (E-mail: cornelius.schwarz{at}uni-tuebingen.de )
ISSN:0022-3077
1522-1598
DOI:10.1152/jn.01170.2005