Loading…
Abstract 4676: In-vitro adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay (ATP-CRA) results comparison between primary and recurrent gynecologic cancer using a unique cohort
Purpose: The standard chemotherapy regimen in gynecologic cancer treatment is not established, particularly in cases of recurrence. The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of in vitro adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay (ATP-CRA) in recurrent gynecologic cancer. Meth...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 2014-10, Vol.74 (19_Supplement), p.4676-4676 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose: The standard chemotherapy regimen in gynecologic cancer treatment is not established, particularly in cases of recurrence. The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of in vitro adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay (ATP-CRA) in recurrent gynecologic cancer.
Methods: We examined 20 matched primary and recurrent tumor pairs of each patient with recurrent gynecologic cancer, using ATP-CRA. Tumor samples were obtained from primary and secondary debulking or palliative surgery. Inhibition rates of the chemotherapeutic agents were compared.
Results: The diseases of patients analyzed in this study were composed of ovarian/peritoneal cancer [11 patients (55%)], uterine cancer [7 patients (35%)], and cervical cancer [3 patients (15%)]. The average of inhibition rate was 36.3% in samples obtained from primary surgery and 33.6% in samples from secondary debulking or palliative surgery (P>0.1). In the primary surgery cases, the drugs showing high inhibition rate were ifosfamide (56.4%), cisplatin (52.6%), and irinotecan (43.3%) in the following order, and in the secondary operation cases, ifosfamide (54.3%), cisplatin (44.3%), and Topotecan (39.9%). The number of cases in which the ATP-CRA result had actual influence in choosing the regimen, were 0 (0%) in primary surgery cases, and 7 (35%) in secondary surgery cases (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-5472 1538-7445 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4676 |