Abstract 11: Antitumor activity of lenvatinib in the renal cell carcinoma cell line RENCA model resistant to a VEGF specific inhibitor

• Published in: Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 2018-07, Vol.78 (13_Supplement), p.11-11
• Main Authors: Ichikawa, Kenji, Miyano, Saori Watanabe, Minoshima, Yukinori, Matsui, Junji
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0008-5472; 1538-7445
• DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2018-11

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies have been in clinical use to treat patients with multiple types of cancers, especially in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, benefits of anti-VEGF therapies are still limited because of the intrinsic/acquired resistance to the treatment. Lenvatinib mesilate (lenvatinib) is an oral multiple receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor that suppresses the kinase activities of VEGF receptors (VEGFR1-3), in addition to other proangiogenic and oncogenic pathway-related RTKs including fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR1-4), the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) α, KIT, and RET. Lenvatinib has been approved as a monotherapy for the treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer and in combination with everolimus for the treatment of patients with RCC treated with one prior anti-VEGF therapy in the US and EU. In this study, we established an anti-VEGF treatment resistant preclinical mouse tumor model. We also examined whether lenvatinib, which targeted multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, showed anti-tumor activity in this model. To establish model resistant to anti-VEGF treatment, an expression vector encoding VEGFR-Fc protein (VEGF decoy) was introduced into a mouse RCC cell line RENCA. First, we confirmed the RENCAVEGFR-Fc transfectants secreted VEGF decoy, which selectively interacted with recombinant VEGF protein but not with ligands to other RTKs in in vitro. Tumor growth in vivo of RENCAVEGFR-Fc was significantly slower than that of RENCAMock. RENCAMock transfectants took 16 days to reach a mean tumor volume (TV) of 500 mm3 whereas RENCAVEGFR-Fc transfectants required 72 days to reach same TV. Furthermore, 72 days after inoculation of RENCAVEGFR-Fc transfectants, we resected tumor tissues and confirmed the expression of VEGF decoy protein. Tumor microvessel density was decreased in resected RENCAVEGFR-Fc tumor compared to the same size of RENCAMock tumor. From the above results, we characterized RENCAVEGFR-Fc tumor was resistant to VEGF decoy. Finally, anti-tumor activity of lenvatinib was challenged against RENCAMock or RENCAVEGFR-Fc tumors. When tumor volume reached approximately 300mm3, 10 mg/kg of lenvatinib was orally administered once daily for 14 days. Treatment of lenvatinib led to almost complete inhibition of tumor growth in both RENCAMock and RENCAVEGFR-Fc models. In conclusion, we developed a mouse RENCAVEGFR-Fc model r