Abstract CT087: Phase I/II study of the WEE1 inhibitor adavosertib in combination with carboplatin in children with advanced malignancies: arm C of the AcSé-ESMART trial

• Published in: Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 2023-04, Vol.83 (8_Supplement), p.CT087-CT087
• Main Authors: Gatz, Susanne A., Harttrampf, Anne C., Brard, Caroline, Bautista, Francisco J., André, Nicolas, Abbou, Samuel, Rubino, Jonathan, Rondof, Windy, Deloger, Marc, Rübsam, Marc, Hübschmann, Daniel, Marshall, Lynley V., Nebchi, Souad, Aerts, Isabelle, Thebaud, Estelle, De Carli, Emilie, Defachelles, Anne-Sophie, Paoletti, Xavier, Godin, Robert, Miah, Kowser, Mortimer, Peter G., Vassal, Gilles, Geoerger, Birgit
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1538-7445; 1538-7445
• DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2023-CT087

Background: AcSé-ESMART is a proof-of-concept, phase I/II platform trial designed to explore targeted agents in a molecularly enriched pediatric population. WEE1 plays a role in DNA repair and cell cycle control and is overexpressed in pediatric cancers. Adavosertib combinations resulted in enhanced antitumor activity compared to single agent in neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, medulloblastoma and high-grade glioma in vivo models. The efficacy and safety of the adavosertib-carboplatin combination has been established in adults with focus on TP53 mutated ovarian cancer. Arm C of AcSé-ESMART applied this regimen to children with advanced malignancies enriched for alterations in TP53, DNA repair/replication stress and cell cycle control. Methods: Adavosertib was administered orally, twice daily on Days 1 to 3 and carboplatin intravenously on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Dose finding used the continuous reassessment method starting at adavosertib 100 mg/m2/dose and carboplatin AUC 5. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and retrospective molecular bioinformatic analysis was performed. Results: Twenty patients (median age: 14.0 years, range 3.4-23.5) were included, 18 received a total of 69 cycles. Seven dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed leading to two de-escalations to adavosertib 75 mg/m2/dose and carboplatin AUC 4. All patients with DLT had thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 requiring transfusions for >7 days and/or neutropenia grade 4 for >7 days. Main overall treatment-related toxicities were hematologic and gastrointestinal. Based on the identified DLT risk, no recommended Phase 2 dose was defined. PK analysis demonstrated equivalent adavosertib exposure in children to that in adults and both doses (75 and 100 mg/m2) achieved the cell kill target. Two patients with neuroblastoma achieved partial response (PR), one with medulloblastoma unconfirmed PR, and five had stable disease (SD) >4 cycles. Patients with PR/SD >4 cycles were considered as clinical benefit (CB) for retrospective molecular analysis. There was no correlation between TP53 genomic alteration alone and response. However, 7 of 8 patients with CB but none of the 10 patients without CB had 1 to 3 genomic alterations in the DNA repair (BRCA2 mutation, 11q loss containing ATM, MRE11A, CHEK1), cell cycle control/replication stress (CCNE1 amplification, RB1 mutation/loss, SETD2 mutation/loss) and RAS pathway (KRAS mutation and amplification, NF1 loss, PTPN11 mutation) in their tumor. Conclusions: Adavosertib combi