Loading…

Abstract B73: Computational model of combined cancer treatment with radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy

Cancer treatment with combination of radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy (IT) (immune check-point inhibitors) has gained promising results in preclinical and clinical studies. Accumulating evidence suggests that RT is beneficial not only because of its direct cytocidal effect but it also acts as an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer immunology research 2017-03, Vol.5 (3_Supplement), p.B73-B73
Main Authors: Valentinuzzi, Damijan, Ursic, Katja, Vrankar, Martina, Simoncic, Urban, Jeraj, Robert
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Cancer treatment with combination of radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy (IT) (immune check-point inhibitors) has gained promising results in preclinical and clinical studies. Accumulating evidence suggests that RT is beneficial not only because of its direct cytocidal effect but it also acts as an immunogenic hub, turning the irradiated tumor into an in situ cancer vaccine. In around 25% of patients such combined treatment results not only in shrinkage of the irradiated tumor but also in shrinkage of distant metastases (abscopal effect). However, little is known about the optimal RT dose and fractionation scheme, scheduling of IT and about which patients are candidates for responders. The results of preclinical and clinical studies addressing those questions are sparse and often contradictory. To help understanding the mechanisms of such therapy, we developed a computational model capable of simulating tumor response to treatment with RT and anti-programmed death 1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies. The model describes interplay between tumor cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) with a set of ordinary differential equations. It incorporates intrinsic tumor and CTLs characteristics, such as radiosensitivity coefficients, PD-1 expression on CTLs, PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression on tumor cells, RT dose-dependent major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) expression on tumor cells, etc. Additionally, we incorporated RT dose-dependent increase of damage-associated molecular patterns that play a crucial role in immunogenic cell death, such as calreticulin, ATP and high mobility group box 1. Finally, we studied pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a novel anti-PD-1 antibody and included it in our model. With tuning of some free parameters we successfully reproduced experimental results from literature (mice tumor model), where tumor response to 3 different therapies (anti-PD-1, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) 1 x 15 Gy, SABR + anti-PD-1) was studied. The focus of our simulations was on primary irradiated tumor. Once we confirmed ability of the model to reproduce experimental results, we performed a sensitivity analysis of free parameters and studied their impact on tumor response. First we analyzed the impact of MHC-I and PD-L1 expression on tumor response to combined therapy. If the fraction of tumor cells expressing MHC-I is low, the therapy with anti-PD-1 has poor effect on tumor regardless of the fraction of tumor cells expressing PD-L1.
ISSN:2326-6066
2326-6074
DOI:10.1158/2326-6074.TUMIMM16-B73