Loading…

Abstract 11: Beneficial Effects of Hcn Inhibitor on Post-Resuscitation Myocardial Dysfunction in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest

Abstract only Introduction: Previous studies have demonstrated that β-adrenergic blocking agents improved neurologic function and the rate of survival. However, its negative inotrope effects that increased the severity of PRMD (post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction). We studied whether ivabradin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2018-11, Vol.138 (Suppl_2)
Main Authors: Yang, Min, Hua, Tianfeng, Chen, Limin, Zou, Yangyang
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract only Introduction: Previous studies have demonstrated that β-adrenergic blocking agents improved neurologic function and the rate of survival. However, its negative inotrope effects that increased the severity of PRMD (post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction). We studied whether ivabradine (IVA) improves PRMD in a cardiac arrest model. Hypothesis: we hypothesized that the rational use of IVA would improve severity of PRMD and prognosis in a porcine model of CA. Methods: Ventricular fibrillation was induced and untreated for 8 minutes in anesthetized domestic swine while defibrillation was attempted after 6 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored continuously after ROSC. Mitral E/A ratio and E/e′ velocity ratio were assessed by echocardiography at Baseline, PR 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24hours after ROSC. The levels of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were measured by ELISA method at Baseline, PR 1, 4 and 24hours. The animals were euthanized 24h after ROSC, and the cardiac tissue was removed for histopathological analysis. Results: Heart rate in the IVA group reduced significantly compared with the control group (all P < 0.05) at PR 1, 2, 4, 8hours. Animals subjected to IVA groups presented significantly better post-resuscitation relaxation function (E/A, E/e′) than those in the Placebo groups (all P < 0.05) (Figure1). IVA group had a lower cTnI and NT-proBNP levels than Placebo group at PR 1, 4 and 24hours (all P < 0.05) (Figure1). Biopsy score in the IVA group was significantly lower at PR 24hours when compared with the Placebo group (all P < 0.05) (Figure2). Conclusions: Heart rate reduction with IVA, improved left ventricular diastolic function and reduced myocardial injury.
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.11