Loading…

Abstract 15400: Impact of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection on Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Outcomes in a Large Nationwide Sample

AimStress-Induced or Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy (TCM) is characterized by transient wall motion abnormalities often preceded by physical or emotional stress. Various baseline medical comorbidities were associated with worse outcomes theoretically due to their effect on chronic stress exposure. The eff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-11, Vol.142 (Suppl_3 Suppl 3), p.A15400-A15400
Main Authors: Ali, Laith, Ghazzal, Amre, Zaghlol, Raja, Radwan, Sohab, Desale, Sameer, Garcia-Garcia, Hector M
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:AimStress-Induced or Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy (TCM) is characterized by transient wall motion abnormalities often preceded by physical or emotional stress. Various baseline medical comorbidities were associated with worse outcomes theoretically due to their effect on chronic stress exposure. The effect of concurrent Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection on outcomes of TCM has not been well established. MethodsWe conducted a US-wide analysis of TCM hospitalizations from 2006 to 2014 by querying the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for the International Classification of Diseases-ninth Revision (ICD-9) TCM code, baseline characteristics, and inpatient outcomes. TCM patients with HIV were compared to TCM patients without HIV. Multivariate regression models were constructed to account for potential confounders. We identified 123,050 patients hospitalized with TCM, of those patients 304 had positive HIV status. ResultsIn unadjusted analysis (figure 1), in-hospital outcomes were worse in TCM patients with HIV in terms of development of acute kidney injury (16.8% vs 33.3%, P-value 0.002), use of invasive mechanical ventilation (18.3% vs 34.5%, P-value 0.003), and mortality (5.3% vs 17.1%, P-value
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.15400