Abstract 15577: Diagnostic Performance of Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography versus Coronary Angiography Fractional Flow Reserve in Estimating Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve: A Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-11, Vol.148 (Suppl_1)
• Main Authors: Elfaituri, Muhammed K, BenGhatnsh, Ahmed, Faraj, Hazem Abdelkarem A, Khaled, Taha, Msherghi, Ahmed
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0009-7322; 1524-4539
• DOI: 10.1161/circ.148.suppl_1.15577

Abstract only Introduction: Precisely estimating myocardial blood flow and flow reserve is crucial in diagnosing and managing ischemic heart disease. Coronary angiography fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been a standard tool. However, the recent emergence of Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (CZT-SPECT) has provided an innovative diagnostic approach. Consequently, a comprehensive comparative analysis of their efficacies in evaluating myocardial blood flow and flow reserve is necessary. Hypothesis: This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CZT-SPECT compared to coronary angiography FFR in estimating myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Methods: A systematic search until July 2022 was conducted across databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, focusing on studies comparing CZT-SPECT and coronary angiography FFR in the estimation of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Utilizing the mada package in R software (version 4.0.3), we conducted diagnostic accuracy analysis by pooling metrics like sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate estimates, diagnostic odds ratio, and positive and negative Likelihood Ratios (LR), all of which were presented with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Results: The meta-analysis incorporated 6 studies with a total patient population of 346. Our findings reveal that CZT-SPECT exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 79.1% (95% CI: 71.8-84.9%, I^2=0) and a specificity of 78.5% (95% CI: 70.4-84.8%, I^2=25.3%). The false-positive rate was 21.5% (95% CI: 15.2-29.6%). Moreover, CZT-SPECT demonstrated a diagnostic odds ratio of 13.75 (95% CI: 7.67-24.65), while the positive likelihood ratio was 3.67 (95% CI: 2.59-5.19), and the negative likelihood ratio stood at 0.26 (95% CI: 0.19-0.37). Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the diagnostic accuracy of CZT-SPECT compared to coronary angiography FFR in estimating myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. These findings indicate that while CZT-SPECT shows promising diagnostic potential, its performance is similar to coronary angiography FFR. The results will be instrumental in informing clinical decision-making and shaping future research directions in the field of cardiovascular imaging.