Loading…

Abstract 19063: An Updated Meta-Analysis Comparing Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Abstract only Introduction: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a type of conduction system pacing that has been considered as an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Hypothesis: We performed a meta-analysis comparing the clin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-11, Vol.148 (Suppl_1)
Main Authors: Siddamsetti, Sisir, Shereef, Hammam, Galuk, Jesse, Bhatia, Atul, Sra, Jasbir
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract only Introduction: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a type of conduction system pacing that has been considered as an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Hypothesis: We performed a meta-analysis comparing the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between LBBAP and BVP in patients requiring CRT. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review in Embase, PubMed, and SCOPUS for all the related articles until November 2022. The literature search yielded 44 publications, of which 6 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The Inverse Variance random effects model was used for continuous variables to calculate Mean Difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and Mantel- Haenszel random effects model was used for dichotomous variables to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Outcomes analyzed were changed in left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricle end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), NYHA class, and QRS duration and patients with the echocardiographic response (as defined as LVEF improvement >5%) and heart failure hospitalizations. Results: Over a mean follow up of 8+/-2 months, LBBAP when compared to BVP resulted in significant difference in LVEF improvement (MD = 5.78 % (95% CI [4.75%, 6.80%], P
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.148.suppl_1.19063