Loading…

Abstract P231: Lipoprotein Lipase Activation Is A Novel Anti-contractile Mechanism That Is Both Endothelium-dependent And Independent

Abstract only Risk factors such as hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia are commonly attributed to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, however, lipoprotein metabolism is also associated with end organ damage and cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979) Tex. 1979), 2023-09, Vol.80 (Suppl_1)
Main Authors: Brezner, Jacob, Januario Da Costa, Tiago, Wilson, Emily, Araujo, Fenix, Wenceslau, Camilla F, McCarthy, Cam
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract only Risk factors such as hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia are commonly attributed to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, however, lipoprotein metabolism is also associated with end organ damage and cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is an important hydrolase for lipoprotein catabolism. Previous work from our lab has shown that LPL activator, NO-1886 (Ibrolipim), significantly decreased vascular contraction. Physiologically, endothelial function limits contractility and endothelial dysfunction is a hallmark of hypertension. Therefore, we hypothesized that LPL activation would cause endothelial-dependent hypocontractility. To test this hypothesis, mesenteric resistance arteries (MRA) were isolated from male Fischer 344 rats at 3 months of age (n=4-12) and mounted onto a wire myograph. Phenylephrine (PE) concentration-response curves were performed with and without LPL activator, NO-1886 (30 min). Some MRA were denuded of their endothelium or incubated with inhibitors of endothelium-dependent vasodilation. As expected, activating LPL exerted a significant anti-contractile effect in a concentration-dependent manner [KCl (%), Veh: 125±3 vs. NO-1886 (1 uM): 116.0±17 vs. NO-1886 (10 uM): 108±9* vs. NO-1886 (50 uM): 55±4* vs. NO-1886 (100 uM): 29±5*, *p
ISSN:0194-911X
1524-4563
DOI:10.1161/hyp.80.suppl_1.P231