Abstract WP115: Cilostazol Addition to Aspirin Does Not Alter the Short-Term Neurological Outcome in Each Clinical Subtype of Acute Stroke

• Published in: Stroke (1970) 2020-02, Vol.51 (Suppl_1)
• Main Authors: Aoki, Junya, Abe, Koji, Masaaki, Uno, Okada, Yasushi, Urabe, Takao, Fujimoto, Shigeru, Matsuoka, Hideki, Yamagata, Sen, Yamagami, Hiroshi, Yamamoto, Yasumasa, Yonehara, Toshiro, Inoue, Takeshi, Yagita, Yoshiki, Kimura, Kazumi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0039-2499; 1524-4628
• DOI: 10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.WP115

Abstract only Hypothesis: Our previous study, ADS reported that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using cilostazol and aspirin did not reduce the rate of short-term neurological worsening in non-cardioembolic stroke patients. The aim of the present study is to investigate 1) whether the impact of cilostazol addition to aspirin differ among each stroke subtype, and 2) factors associated with neurological deterioration and/or stroke recurrence in order to find therapeutic target. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis using the ADS databank. Neurological worsening and the rates of stroke recurrence within 14 day of onset were evaluated. Stroke subtype included large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA), lacunae infarct (LI), branch atheromatous disease (BAD), other, and undetermined. Results: Data on 1,160 patients (773 [67%] men; median age, 69 [61-77] years, NIHSS score was 2 [1-4]) were analyzed. At discharge, 167 (14%) were diagnoses as having LAA; LI, 532 (46%); BAD, 173 (15%); other, 132 (11%); and undetermined, 156 (14%). Neurological deterioration and/or recurrence were seen in 130 (11%) patients, and the rates were not different between patients treated with DAPT and aspirin in any stroke subtypes: LAA, 19% (DAPT) vs. 11% (aspirin alone), (p=0.185); LI, 4% vs. 3% (p=0.645); BAD, 33% vs.34%, (p=0.872), other, 8% vs.14% (p=0.272); undetermined, 13% vs. 8% (p=0.301). When we evaluated factors related to the deterioration/recurrence, age (p