Abstract P723: Adaptation of Stroke Prevention Interventions for Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review

• Published in: Stroke (1970) 2021-03, Vol.52 (Suppl_1), p.AP723-AP723
• Main Authors: Ryan, Nessa, Washburn, Kameko, Rebello, Vida, Gutierrez, Desiree, Perez, Hector, Drum, Emily, Boden-Albala, Bernadette
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0039-2499; 1524-4628
• DOI: 10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.P723

IntroductionStroke is a leading cause of mortality globally, with 85% of stroke death occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Translation of evidence-based stroke prevention interventions from their original setting to the novel context in which they will be implemented is often unreported; especially in LMICs where it has been severely understudied. Thus, our objective was to investigate how adaptation has been examined within research on stroke prevention interventions in LMICs through a scoping review of the available literature in order to highlight benefits and best-practices, identify gaps, and develop a greater understanding of these efforts that will ultimately support attempts to address the global burden of stroke. MethodsThis review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five databases were searched (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science), for eligible studies using a search strategy developed in consultation with a research librarian. Two reviewers independently assessed the retrieved articles for selection based on the inclusion criteria (peer-reviewed empirical papers or protocols, reported on adaptation of stroke prevention interventions, and occurred in at least one LMIC) through a two phase process consisting of (1) title and abstract screening and (2) full-text screening. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion until consensus was reached. Data were charted and a narrative synthesis, guided by the FRAME framework, was used to analyze and interpret the findings. ResultsOf 380 articles retrieved, a total of six articles reporting adaptation of primary (n=4) or secondary (n=2) stroke prevention interventions in LMICs were identified. Types of interventions included use of community health workers (n = 2), use of mHealth tools (n=2), and interventions aimed at risk factor modification (n = 2). Adaptations were proactively planned, with multiple adaptation goals reported. ConclusionsThis is the first review of its kind to focus on adaptation of evidence-based stroke prevention interventions in LMICs. Through our systematic investigation, we highlight the need for additional research to assess the processes and outcomes of stroke prevention interventions.