Loading…

Diffusion deep learning for brain age prediction and longitudinal tracking in children through adulthood

Deep learning (DL)-based prediction of biological age in the developing human from a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (“ ”) may have important diagnostic and therapeutic applications as a non-invasive biomarker of brain health, aging, and neurocognition. While previous deep learning tools for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) Mass.), 2024-03, Vol.2, p.1-14
Main Authors: Zapaishchykova, Anna, Tak, Divyanshu, Ye, Zezhong, Liu, Kevin X., Likitlersuang, Jirapat, Vajapeyam, Sridhar, Chopra, Rishi B., Seidlitz, Jakob, Bethlehem, Richard A.I., Mak, Raymond H., Mueller, Sabine, Haas-Kogan, Daphne A., Poussaint, Tina Y., Aerts, Hugo J.W.L., Kann, Benjamin H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Deep learning (DL)-based prediction of biological age in the developing human from a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (“ ”) may have important diagnostic and therapeutic applications as a non-invasive biomarker of brain health, aging, and neurocognition. While previous deep learning tools for predicting brain age have shown promising capabilities using single-institution, cross-sectional datasets, our work aims to advance the field by leveraging multi-site, longitudinal data with externally validated and independently implementable code to facilitate clinical translation and utility. This builds on prior foundational efforts in brain age modeling to enable broader generalization and individual’s longitudinal brain development. Here, we leveraged 32,851 T1-weighted MRI scans from healthy children and adolescents aged 3 to 30 from 16 multisite datasets to develop and evaluate several DL brain age frameworks, including a novel regression diffusion DL network (AgeDiffuse). In a multisite external validation (5 datasets), we found that AgeDiffuse outperformed conventional DL frameworks, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.78 years (interquartile range [IQR]: [1.2-3.9]). In a second, separate external validation (3 datasets), AgeDiffuse yielded an MAE of 1.97 years (IQR: [0.8-2.8]). We found that AgeDiffuse brain age predictions reflected age-related brain structure volume changes better than biological age (R = 0.48 vs. R = 0.37). Finally, we found that longitudinal predicted brain age tracked closely with chronological age at the individual level. To enable independent validation and application, we made AgeDiffuse publicly available and usable for the research community.
ISSN:2837-6056
2837-6056
DOI:10.1162/imag_a_00114