The Theory of Being and the Argument for Forms in Plato's Sophist

Abstract This paper argues for two claims. First, that in the Sophist a metaphysical theory of being is constructed from the ground up, largely on the basis of a claim treated as an axiomatic principle, the 'dunamis proposal' (247d-e), which, I will argue, ought to be understood as Plato&#...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Phronesis (Leiden, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2024-09, Vol.69 (4), p.402-438
Main Author: Leigh, Fiona
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract This paper argues for two claims. First, that in the Sophist a metaphysical theory of being is constructed from the ground up, largely on the basis of a claim treated as an axiomatic principle, the 'dunamis proposal' (247d-e), which, I will argue, ought to be understood as Plato's own definition of being. Second, once its core is in place, the theory is put to use to provide dialectical arguments against proponents of alternative metaphysical theories for the existence of various entities in the ontology. These include-notably-an argument for the existence of Forms.
ISSN:0031-8868
1568-5284
DOI:10.1163/15685284-bja10096