Loading…
Storm Gust Prediction with the Integration of Machine Learning Algorithms and WRF Model Variables for the Northeast United States
Wind gusts are often associated with severe hazards and can cause structural and environmental damages, making gust prediction a crucial element of weather forecasting services. In this study, we explored the utilization of machine learning (ML) algorithms integrated with numerical weather predictio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Artificial intelligence for the earth systems 2024-07, Vol.3 (3) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Wind gusts are often associated with severe hazards and can cause structural and environmental damages, making gust prediction a crucial element of weather forecasting services. In this study, we explored the utilization of machine learning (ML) algorithms integrated with numerical weather prediction outputs from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model, to align the estimation of wind gust potential with observed gusts. We have used two ML algorithms, namely, random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB), along with two statistical techniques: generalized linear model with identity link function (GLM-Identity) and generalized linear model with log link function (GLM-Log), to predict storm wind gusts for the northeast (NE) United States. We used 61 simulated extratropical and tropical storms that occurred between 2005 and 2020 to develop and validate the ML and statistical models. To assess the ML model performance, we compared our results with postprocessed gust potential from WRF. Our findings showed that ML models, especially XGB, performed significantly better than statistical models and Unified Post Processor for the WRF (WRF-UPP) Model and were able to better align predicted with observed gusts across all storms. The ML models faced challenges capturing the upper tail of the gust distribution, and the learning curves suggested that XGB was more effective than RF in generating better predictions with fewer storms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2769-7525 2769-7525 |
DOI: | 10.1175/AIES-D-23-0047.1 |