Loading…

Effects of severe hydronephrosis on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with one-shot dilation method

Objective: To investigate the effect of the presence of severe hydronephrosis on percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) outcome in patients who underwent PNL operation with one-shot dilatation technique. Materials and methods: Medical data of 989 patients underwent PNL operation in our clinic between 20...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urologia 2022-05, Vol.89 (2), p.221-225
Main Authors: Micoogullari, Uygar, Yucel, Cem, Sueluzgen, Tufan, Kisa, Erdem, Keskin, Mehmet Zeynel, Isoglu, Cemal Selcuk, Ilbey, Yusuf Ozlem
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: To investigate the effect of the presence of severe hydronephrosis on percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) outcome in patients who underwent PNL operation with one-shot dilatation technique. Materials and methods: Medical data of 989 patients underwent PNL operation in our clinic between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. We included 373 of the patients underwent PNL operation due to renal pelvic stone, who were older than 18 years of age, who did not have any urinary tract abnormality, and had no previous history of open renal stone operation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of severe hydronephrosis and absence of hydronephrosis. These two groups were compared in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), number of stones, stone burden, operation duration, fluoroscopy time, hospitalization time, hemoglobin and creatinine change, complications, and stone free rate. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, BMI, stone number, stone size, stone density, operation duration, fluoroscopy time, and hospitalization duration. The mean change in hemoglobin was 1.5 g/dL in group 1 and 1.1 g/dL in group 2. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.006). Postoperative blood transfusion was required for 3 patients (2.1%) in group 1 and 12 patients (5.1%) in group 2. This difference was statistically significant (p 
ISSN:0391-5603
1724-6075
DOI:10.1177/03915603211001175