Goal Conflict in the Juvenile Court: The Evolution of Sentencing Practices in the United States

The United States has experienced significant changes in its juvenile justice system since it began in 1899. The focus of juvenile sentencing has shifted from the best interests of the child to more punitive sanctions, which are based on the offense committed. An alternative method for dealing with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of contemporary criminal justice 2003-11, Vol.19 (4), p.454-479
Main Authors: Urban, Lynn S., Cyr, Jenna L., Decker, Scott H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The United States has experienced significant changes in its juvenile justice system since it began in 1899. The focus of juvenile sentencing has shifted from the best interests of the child to more punitive sanctions, which are based on the offense committed. An alternative method for dealing with offenders has arisen in the form of restorative justice, which focuses on balancing the justice response between offender, victim, and community. This article describes the changes in the U.S. juvenile system, highlights the sentencing practices in other countries, and addresses this conflict between punitive and restorative practices.
ISSN:1043-9862
1552-5406
DOI:10.1177/1043986203259484