Energy based damage model for low-cycle fatigue of ductile materials

• Published in: International journal of damage mechanics 2024-09
• Main Authors: Perović, Zoran B, Šumarac, Dragoslav M, Ćorić, Stanko B, Knežević, Petar M, Cao, Maosen, Nurković, Ismail
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1056-7895; 1530-7921
• DOI: 10.1177/10567895241282416

A uniaxial material model for fatigue damage accumulation, established on the connection of unit elements, is presented in this paper. Although these units are regarded as micro-elements in the proposed model, they are based on a hysteretic operator that enables calculating hysteretic energy loss as an analytical expression. Further, this unit element represents a mechanical model with elastoplastic damage behavior in function of strain. The second level of modeling is defined by the connection of these units (micro-elements) with different values of total energy dissipated at failure. By changing the distribution of dissipated energy limit, various fatigue damage evolution laws are developed. Calculation of total and hysteretic energy loss in one loading cycle is also affected by fatigue damage as the varying number of unit elements are been eliminated when their maximum dissipation energy is reached. Material parameters for the model were defined based on the experimental monotonic and cyclic stress-strain tests, still, detailed comparison was not performed as the main advantage and aim of the paper was the development of the method for assessment of damage evolution in fatigue analysis. On the other hand, the number of cycles to failure ( N f ) and total heat dissipation are compared in both qualitative and quantitative aspects with experimental results. Finally, based on the proposed model, mean strain and load sequence effect diagrams were constructed. It is shown that the proposed model can provide a reliable estimation of fatigue life in the low-cycle regime of loading. The maximum error for the calculated N f was 3% for constant strain loading for experiments with strain amplitude less than 5%. In load sequence fatigue life estimation, the proposed model demonstrated good accuracy, with a maximum error of 34%. Further, obtained results were achieved with different types of damage evolution that could be defined for the same material and fatigue life.