Loading…
'This is NOT human services': Counter-mapping automated decision-making in social services in Australia
This paper offers a counter-map of automation in social services decision-making in Australia. It aims to amplify alternative discourses that are often obscured by power inequalities and disadvantage. Redden (2005) has used counter-mapping to frame an analysis of big data in government in Canada, co...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of sociology (Melbourne, Vic.) Vic.), 2024-09, Vol.60 (3), p.618–642-618–642 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This paper offers a counter-map of automation in social services decision-making in Australia. It aims to amplify alternative discourses that are often obscured by power inequalities and disadvantage. Redden (2005) has used counter-mapping to frame an analysis of big data in government in Canada, contrasting with 'dominant outward facing government discourses about big data applica- tions' to focus on how data practices are both socially shaped and shaping. This paper reports on a counter-mapping project undertaken in Australia using a mixed methods approach incorporating document analysis, interviews and web scraping to amplify divergent discourses about automated decision-making. It demonstrates that when the focus of analysis moves beyond dominant dis- courses of neoliberal efficiency, cost cutting, accuracy and industriousness, alternative discourses of service users' experiences of automated decision-making as oppressive, harmful, punitive and inhuman(e) can be located. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1440-7833 1741-2978 |
DOI: | 10.1177/14407833241266022 |