It’s just not true

Simon Springer’s argument for anarchist geography is both an unsubstantiated dismissal of the Marxian tradition and an uncritical celebration of the anarchism he endorses. There may be good reasons to be wary of the influence of Marxism and Marxists in ‘radical’ geography, but his politically ungene...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dialogues in human geography 2014-11, Vol.4 (3), p.271-275
Main Author: Mann, Geoff
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Simon Springer’s argument for anarchist geography is both an unsubstantiated dismissal of the Marxian tradition and an uncritical celebration of the anarchism he endorses. There may be good reasons to be wary of the influence of Marxism and Marxists in ‘radical’ geography, but his politically ungenerous and analytically wrong representation of Marxism and Marxism geography is not the place to begin.
ISSN:2043-8206
2043-8214
DOI:10.1177/2043820614541026