A Failure to Start: Aborted Activation of CAR T Cells in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

• Published in: Blood 2019-11, Vol.134 (Supplement_1), p.681-681
• Main Authors: Collins, McKensie, Kong, Weimin, Jung, Inyoung, Wang, Meng, Lundh, Stefan M, June, Carl H, Melenhorst, J. Joseph
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0006-4971; 1528-0020
• DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-122063

Introduction: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is a CD19+ B-cell malignancy that accounts for approximately 25% of adult leukemia diagnoses in the developed world. While conventional therapies have some efficacy, there are few curative therapeutic options and many patients ultimately progress to relapsed or refractory disease. CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has provided some hope, but induces complete remission in only 26% of patients. This suboptimal response rate is believed to be due to T cell dysfunction and immune-suppression by CLL cells, the mechanisms of which are poorly understood. Results: To understand the causes of CAR T cell dysfunction in CLL we investigated the defects that CLL cells induced in normal donor CD19-targeting CAR T cells. CAR T cells were repeatedly stimulated at 5-day intervals with either primary CLL cells from patients or a CD19-expressing control cell line (aAPC). Repeat stimulation of CAR T cells with aAPCs resulted in 5.36 ± .94 population doublings after three stimulations, whereas CLL cells only evoked 2.39 ± .92 population doublings. We performed phenotyping, proliferation analysis, and cytokine analysis of stimulated CAR T cells. CLL-stimulated T cells appeared un-activated, with low levels of PD-1, LAG3, and TIM3, low levels of cytokine production, and a high proportion of non-cycling cells as measured by Ki67 staining. We first hypothesized that CLL cells induce an altered epigenetic program that prevents effector function and is stabilized by successive stimulations. To test this, we stimulated CAR T cells with CLL cells or aAPCs as indicated in Fig. 1A. CLL-stimulated CAR T cells failed to proliferate or produce cytokines, but subsequent stimulation with aAPCs rescued these functions (Fig. 1B). Further, CLL-stimulated CAR T cells did not differentiate, suggesting that CLL cells do not induce stable defects but rather insufficiently activate CAR T cells (Fig. 1C). These cells also appeared un-activated as indicated by low levels of PD-1 and Ki67. We then used flow cytometry to assess expression of costimulatory and inhibitory molecules on the primary CLL samples. We found that the levels of co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules, namely CD80/CD86 and CD54/CD58 respectively were found at low frequencies, and where present were expressed at low levels. This suggested that one mechanism behind the lack of CAR T cell effector responses may be that a lack of co-stimulation prevents proper