Loading…
Circulating DNA for Molecular Response Prediction, Characterization of Resistance Mechanisms and Quantification of CAR T-Cells during Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Therapy
Background: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR19) T-cells have significant activity in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL (rrDLBCL). While the majority of rrDLBCL patients receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel)achieve complete responses, a significant subset of patients experience di...
Saved in:
Published in: | Blood 2019-11, Vol.134 (Supplement_1), p.550-550 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR19) T-cells have significant activity in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL (rrDLBCL). While the majority of rrDLBCL patients receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel)achieve complete responses, a significant subset of patients experience disease progression (Locke FL, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has demonstrated utility for predicting therapeutic benefit in DLBCL, as well as for detecting emergent resistance mechanisms to targeted therapies. Here we apply cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis to patients receiving Axi-cel, to characterize molecular responses, resistance mechanisms, and to track CAR19 cells.
Methods: We performed Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq) on DNA from germline and plasma samples collected prior to CAR T-cell infusion, multiple time-points post infusion, and, where available, at the time of relapse from 30 patients receiving Axi-cel for rrDLBCL at Stanford University. We designed a novel hybrid-capture panel and analysis pipeline designed to detect both tumor variants, as well as Axi-cel specific recombinant retroviral sequences to quantify CAR19 levels in cfDNA. Tumor variants were identified prior to and following Axi-cel therapy to assess for emergent variants, and Axi-cel specific sequences were quantified.
Results: The median follow-up for the 30 patients after Axi-cel infusion was 10 months, with 47% (14/30) of patients experiencing disease progression after Axi-cel therapy. We identified an average of 164.3 SNVs per case (range:1-685) before Axi-cel therapy; the most common coding variants identified at baseline were in MLL2 (29.2%), BCL2 (22.5%), and TP53 (19.3%). When treated as a continuous variable, pretreatment ctDNA levels were prognostic of PFS (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.11-4.21, P=0.02). Using a previously established ctDNA threshold to stratify disease burden (2.5 log10(hGE/mL); Kurtz et al. JCO 2018), we observed significantly superior PFS in patients with low pretreatment ctDNA levels treated with Axi-cel (Fig. 1A). In the majority of Axi-cel treated patients (62.9%), ctDNA was detectable at day 28, and PFS was significantly longer in patients with undetectable ctDNA at this time-point (Fig. 1B). Multiple putative resistance mechanisms were identified at relapse after Axi-cel, including emergent variants in CD19, HVEM, and TP53, as well as copy number gains in PD-L1 (Fig. 1C). For example, in one patient, a C |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-4971 1528-0020 |
DOI: | 10.1182/blood-2019-129015 |