Loading…

A Multi-Omic Precision Medicine Clinical Trial in Acute Leukemia

Background: Conventional precision medicine for cancer targets specific gene mutations, but single agent inhibitors rarely result in remission or improve survival in acute leukemia. Current functional screening strategies assay individual drugs, thus missing potential synergistic combinations. We th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Blood 2019-11, Vol.134 (Supplement_1), p.1269-1269
Main Authors: Becker, Pamela S., Oehler, Vivian G., Blau, Carl Anthony, Martins, Timothy S, Curley, Niall, Chien, Sylvia, Dai, Jin, Kauer, Nicole, Yeung, Ka Yee, Hung, Ling-Hong, Hammer, Cody, Hendrie, Paul C., Percival, Mary-Elizabeth M., Cassaday, Ryan D., Scott, Bart L., Walter, Roland B., Gardner, Kelda, Gwin, Mary, Smith, Heather, Carson, Andrew, Patay, Bradley, Estey, Elihu H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Conventional precision medicine for cancer targets specific gene mutations, but single agent inhibitors rarely result in remission or improve survival in acute leukemia. Current functional screening strategies assay individual drugs, thus missing potential synergistic combinations. We therefore developed a multi-omic approach that integrates mutation data, gene expression data (transcriptome), and in vitro drug sensitivity (functional) data to select drugs including drug combinations for individual patients. Herein we report results of the clinical trial testing this concept [NCT02551718]. This study contributed to validation of 44 genes identified for which expression correlates with drug sensitivity (Lee S-I et al. Nat Commun 2018). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients failed at least 2 prior regimens, or if adverse risk, one multi-drug intensive regimen, had ECOG PS 0-3 and at least 1 million blasts in blood, marrow, tissue or fluid for analysis. The original enrollment was 25 patients to establish feasibility, and the study was later expanded to provide an option for refractory patients. Samples were obtained from the 54 consented patients (44 AML, 8 ALL, 2 acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage). Median age is 58 (range 23-82) and 31.5% of patients had an antecedent hematologic disorder. Of the AML patients (n=44), 7 were favorable, 13 intermediate, and 24 adverse risk (ELN 2017). Patients had a median of 3 prior treatments (range 1-6); 39 patients (72%) had relapsed after prior complete remission (CR) with median duration of 6 months (m) (range: 0-52 m), and 20 had relapsed after allogeneic transplant, 8 within the first 100 days, and 3 never achieved a CR after transplant. Enriched blasts were assayed in a custom CLIA-approved high throughput sensitivity (HTS) screen with 153 drugs and combinations, both conventional and targeted inhibitors, both FDA approved and investigational. Results were obtained within a mean of 5.2 (range 4-7) days. Mutation testing was performed by Invivoscribe using MyAML® targeted NGS panel. Clinical outcomes examined were peripheral blast reduction, response and survival. Results: Twenty-nine patients (53.7%; 25 AML, 2 ALL, 2 acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage) received therapy based on the HTS and mutation analysis. The remaining patients did not receive protocol treatment for a variety of reasons, including insufficient marrow blasts for testing, opting for palliative care, returning to their local area,
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2019-130996