Relmacabtagene Autoleucel CD19 CART Therapy for Adults with Heavily-Pretreated Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma in China

• Published in: Blood 2021-11, Vol.138 (Supplement 1), p.3557-3557
• Main Authors: Song, Yuqin, Ying, Zhitao, Yang, Haiyan, Guo, Ye, Li, Wenyu, Zou, Dehui, Zhou, Daobin, Wang, Zhao, Zhang, Mingzhi, Wu, Jianqiu, Liu, Hui, Zhang, Pian, Yang, Su, Zhou, Zisong, Zheng, Hongxia, Zhu, Jun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0006-4971; 1528-0020
• DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-148358

Introduction Prognosis for relapsed and refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) is poor, and treatment remains challenging. Relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel) is a CD19-directed 4-1BB/CD3z chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) product manufactured in China. RELIANCE study is the first CAR-T study with CD19 as target that got IND approved by the authority in China. Initial findings of the pivotal Phase 2 single-arm, multicenter RELIANCE trial demonstrated high response rates and low rates of CAR-T-associated toxicity with relma-cel treatment in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with r/r LBCL (NCT04089215; Ying et al. Cancer Med 2020;10:999-1011). Long-term follow-up data for the RELIANCE study are presented. Materials & Methods Fifty-nine adults (age ≥18 years) with heavily pretreated (≥2 prior therapies), measurable and histologically confirmed r/r LBCL were randomized to receive lymphodepletion chemotherapy (LDC: fludarabine 25 mg/m 2 + cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m 2 daily×3) followed by a single infusion of autologous CAR+ T cells at a dose of 100×10 6 or 150×10 6. Pts were evaluated for efficacy using Lugano criteria and for toxicity using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03 and for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) using Lee et al. (Blood 2014;124(2):188-95). Primary endpoint was 3-month objective response rate (ORR); key secondary endpoints included complete response rate (CRR) at 3 months, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) profile. The data cutoff date was December 31, 2020. Results At the time of analysis, all 59 pts (median age 56.0 years, range 18-75 years) were at least 15 months post-treatment with relma-cel (7 pts completed trial, 34 pts on study, 18 pts withdrew). Among the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population of 58 efficacy-evaluable pts, best ORR was 77.6%, with a best CRR of 51.7%; ORR and CRR at 3-month-postdose landmark were 60.3% and 44.8%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 17.9 months (range 0.3-25.6 months), median PFS (mITT) was 7.0 months (95% CI 4.8-not reached [NR]). Median PFS was NR (95% CI 8.8 months-NR) for pts with compete response (CR) at 3 months, the 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-month PFS rates were 80.8%, 69.2%, 69.2% and 69.2%, respectively (Figure). PFS was associated with objective response or CR at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (log-rank test, p≤0.002). Median OS was NR (95% CI NR-NR) for both the mITT popula