Venetoclax Has Potent Efficacy in NPM1 mutated AML with Acquired Resistance Associated with Either Perturbed Pro-Survival Signalling or NPM1 wild-Type Populations

• Published in: Blood 2023-11, Vol.142 (Supplement 1), p.423-423
• Main Authors: Chua, Chong Chyn, Anstee, Natasha, Flensburg, Christoffer, Teh, Charis, Ivey, Adam, Amin, Noorul, Thijssen, Rachel, Bohlander, Stefan K., Kakadia, Purvi M., Xu, Zhen, Fong, Chun Yew, Ting, Stephen, Loo, Sun, Tiong, Ing Soo, Gray, Daniel, Fleming, Shaun, Davidson, Nadia, Roberts, Andrew W., Majewski, Ian, Wei, Andrew H., Brown, Fiona C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0006-4971; 1528-0020
• DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-185321

Background We have previously reported outcomes for patients (pts) receiving venetoclax (VEN) combined with intensive chemotherapy in fit older pts ≥65 years with newly diagnosed AML (Chua et al, JCO 2020). In contrast to younger populations, NPM1(mut) does confer favorable prognosis in older AML populations. Our prior studies indicate that VEN-based therapies in older pts have promising efficacy in NPM1(mut) AML (DiNardo et al, Blood 2020). To characterise this further, we performed a posthoc analysis of the efficacy of single agent VEN and in combination with chemotherapy in NPM1(mut) AML in the CAVEAT study and explored mechanisms of treatment failure using a multi-omic approach. Methods NPM1 MRD was performed using RT-qPCR (sensitivity 10 -6). Integrated analysis from bulk sequencing (targeted 42-gene NGS, whole exome/genome sequencing (WES/WGS), RNAseq), single cell (sc) proteogenomic and transcriptomic assessments (scDNA plus surface protein, Tapestri MissioBio; scRNAseq, 10x Genomics) were performed. Flow cytometry included analysis of BCL-2, BCL-XL, MCL1 and BFL1 expression. Results Of 85 pts enrolled on the CAVEAT study, 20 had NPM1(mut). Median age of NPM1(mut) vs (wt) was 71 vs 70 years. At a median follow-up of 38.6 months, CR/CRi rates and median OS for NPM1(mut) vs (wt) was 85% vs 72% (p=0.37), and 43.9 vs 15.1 months (p=0.04), respectively. Pts received a 7-day VEN monotherapy pre-phase prior to CAVEAT induction with paired bone marrow (BM) assessments pre- and at day 8 to evaluate VEN sensitivity. NPM1(mut) pts had a greater median relative blast reduction after 7-day VEN at -66% (range -7 to -98%), compared to -37% (range +51 to -94%) for NPM1(wt) (p=0.03). 18/20 NPM1(mut) sub-group pts completed induction and 17 had serial NPM1 MRD assessments. The NPM1(mut) level fell a median of 4.55-log 10 following induction, with 6 (35%) pts achieving MRD negative (MRDneg) status. After all consolidation, 12/16 (75%) were MRDneg. 12/12 (100%) pts in long-term follow up remain MRDneg. We investigated the mechanisms of resistance in the 5/20 pts with NPM1(mut) whose disease was primary refractory (RD; n=1) or had acquired secondary resistance (Fig). Two patients (CAL-045, CAL-021) had shown BM blast reductions of ≥45% during VEN pre-phase. Subsequently, at the time of clinical treatment failure, both were NPM1(mut) MRD negative indicating eradication of the starting NPM1(mut) clone and early evolution of a new NPM1(wt) population as the mechanism of re