Loading…
Avespa Study: Effectiveness and Safety of Avatrombopag in Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP). a Real-World Study of the Spanish ITP Group (GEPTI)
Background Thrombopoietin receptor analogues (TPO-RAs) are recommended as second-line treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Avatrombopag (AVA) is the last oral AR-TPO approved for use in Spain and also recommended for second-line use, for which few real-life data are currently available. Our...
Saved in:
Published in: | Blood 2024-11, Vol.144 (Supplement 1), p.713-713 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Thrombopoietin receptor analogues (TPO-RAs) are recommended as second-line treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Avatrombopag (AVA) is the last oral AR-TPO approved for use in Spain and also recommended for second-line use, for which few real-life data are currently available. Our objective is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AVA in severe and moderate/mild ITP patients, including those who have not responded to other treatments; to explore AVA's potential to reduce concomitant immunosuppressive therapies and compare its efficacy and safety in newly diagnosed/persistent ITP patients with those with chronic ITP.
Methods
The AVESPA study was a national, multicenter, retrospective study conducted by The Spanish ITP Group (GEPTI) of the Spanish Society of Haematology and Haemotherapy (SEHH). The study enrolled patients diagnosed with chronic, persistent, newly diagnosed ITP who began treatment with AVA from July 2022 to January 2024. The study assessed rates and time to response (R) (>50x109/L) and complete response (CR) (>100x109/L), duration of response (DOR), loss of response (LOR), adverse events (AEs), and treatment withdrawal before the end of follow-up. The calculations were performed for the entire cohort and in patients who initially presented with severe (3 lines of treatment, respectively.
In the severe ITP group, 154/193 (79.8%) and 20/193 (10.4%) patients achieved complete response (CR, [PC>100x109/L) and response (R, PC>50x109/L), respectively. Among 129 severe ITP patients who were still on AVA at their last visit, 87(67.4%) and 26(20.1%) had CR and R, respectively.
Results were similar in the 104 severe ITP patients who switched to AVA due to previous treatment failure. Severe ITP patients reached R and CR in 13 (7-21) and 14 (9-35) days, respectively. Eighty-seven percent of |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-4971 1528-0020 |
DOI: | 10.1182/blood-2024-200861 |