Loading…

Peripheral Stem Cell Mobilization with Chemotherapy + G-CSF Priming in a Large Series of Patients with Lymphoma Candidates to Autologous Transplantation. An Analysis of Baseline and Ongoing Predictors of Failure or Suboptimal Stem Cell Collection

Abstract 2149 Poster Board II-126 Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a potentially curative treatment for lymphoma. Adequate stem cell (SC) collection is possible in the majority of cases but poor mobilization remains a major issue in some patients (pts). New agents were recently develop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Blood 2009-11, Vol.114 (22), p.2149-2149
Main Authors: Morello, Enrico, Almici, Camillo, Arcaini, Luca, Baushi, Liliana, Botto, Barbara, Castelli, Andrea, Nosari, Annamaria, Pica, Gianmatteo, Ripamonti, Francesco, Salvi, Flavia, Carella, Angelo Michele, Gaidano, Gianluca, Levis, Alessandro, Morra, Enrica, Vitolo, Umberto, Giuseppe, Rossi
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract 2149 Poster Board II-126 Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a potentially curative treatment for lymphoma. Adequate stem cell (SC) collection is possible in the majority of cases but poor mobilization remains a major issue in some patients (pts). New agents were recently developed which may improve the rate of SC mobilization. A retrospective analysis was conducted on a large series of lymphoma pts candidates to ASCT in order to identify factors influencing SC mobilization outcome. Potential early markers of poor mobilization were also evaluated. A total of 415 attempts of PBSC collection consecutively performed at 7 Italian centres in 388 pts affected by lymphoma were analyzed. Their median age was 52. A collection of less than 2×106 CD34+ cells/kg was defined as “mobilization failure” and of more than 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg as “good mobilization”. The following parameters were analysed for correlation with mobilization outcome: lymphoma diagnosis, disease status at mobilization, type of mobilizing chemotherapy, bone marrow infiltration at collection, n° of previous lines of therapy, prior use of fludarabine, alkylating agents or radiotherapy. The ratio between circulating CD34+cells/nL and total WBC/μL on the first day of CD34+ count (SCratio) was also analysed, trying to predict mobilization failure. Both univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed with SPSS package 13.0. Lymphoma diagnosis was diffuse large B cell/Burkitt in 38%, follicular in 10%, mantle in 13%, Hodgkin in 26%, T or NK/T in 6%, and other in 7% of cases. Disease status at apheresis was CR in 25%, chemosensitive in 49% and refractory in 26%. Mobilization was attempted during first-line therapy in 14%, in 37% during second-line and in 26% at third- or subsequent lines of therapy. Fludarabine, alkylating agents and extended-fields radiotherapy had been used prior to mobilization in 5%, 73% and 13% of cases respectively. Marrow infiltration by lymphoma was present in 17,7% and 7,7% of patients had failed a prior mobilization attempt. In 99% of cases (411/415) mobilizing therapy included chemotherapy and G-CSF. Two pts received AMD3100 and 2 G-CSF. Several chemotherapy programs were used for mobilization. For analysis purposes they were grouped as follows: single-agent cyclophosphamide (CTX) in 62 (15,1%); high-dose cytarabine, either single agent or in combination (HD-ARAC) in 143 (34,8%), etoposide-containing regimens in 119 (30,0%), and platinum con
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood.V114.22.2149.2149