Loading…

Understanding United States (US) Treatment Practices for the Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Clinical Practice: A US Subgroup Analysis of the WORLD CML Registry

Abstract 2781 The WORLD CML Registry, with sites in the US, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, Africa, Russia, and Turkey, is a multinational, prospective registry established to longitudinally assess global clinical practice patterns for the management of patients (pts) with CML. Here, w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Blood 2012-11, Vol.120 (21), p.2781-2781
Main Authors: Hermann, Robert, Miller, Carole B., Catchatorian, Rosalind, Snyder, David S., Ericson, Solveig G., Zernovak, Oleg, Juma, Matthews A, Cortes, Jorge E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract 2781 The WORLD CML Registry, with sites in the US, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, Africa, Russia, and Turkey, is a multinational, prospective registry established to longitudinally assess global clinical practice patterns for the management of patients (pts) with CML. Here, we report updated results for the subgroup of pts at US sites and evaluate alignment of US practice patterns with current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines for CML (http://www.nccn.org). Pts (≥ 16 y of age) within 6 mo + 2 weeks of confirmed CML diagnosis were enrolled. Baseline demographics and medical history were collected at enrollment. Information on disease status and management was collected approximately every 6 mo or with a change in disease status or management. Adverse events (AEs) were collected only if they resulted in a dose/regimen change, nonadherence to treatment, or death. This analysis includes 377 evaluable pts (those with confirmed informed consent forms and no protocol deviations) of 418 total pts enrolled in the US from February 2008 to December 31, 2010. Median age was 53 y (range, 18–91 y), with 26% ≥ 65 y of age. CML diagnosis was confirmed using hematologic (85%), bone marrow (84%), cytogenetic (82%), and molecular (polymerase chain reaction [PCR]; 52%) assessments. Nearly all pts (96%) were diagnosed in chronic phase (CP; Table). Most pts with CML-CP (73%) were treated with imatinib (Glivec®/Gleevec®) as first-line therapy (additional pts may have received first-line imatinib in a clinical trial). Median duration of imatinib treatment in CML-CP pts was 7.59 mo (range, 0.03–33.54 mo). In CML-CP pts (n = 363), imatinib dose was increased in 29 pts (8%; primary reasons included physician request [4%] and lack of efficacy [7%]), decreased in 32 pts (9%; primary reasons included AEs [5%] and physician request [3%]), and interrupted in 10 pts (3%; primary reasons included AEs [2%]). Regimen was switched from imatinib to nilotinib in 21 pts (6%; primary reasons included lack of efficacy [2%] and AEs [2%]) and to dasatinib in 20 pts (6%; primary reasons included AEs [2%], lack of efficacy [1%], and physician request [1%]). Disease burden over time on imatinib was most commonly assessed using blood counts (Table). Only 16% of pts had a molecular assessment at 3 mo; at later time points, 43%-64% of pts had molecular assessments. Cytogenetics was least common (done in 13% of pts at 3 mo and 25%-34% of pts a
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood.V120.21.2781.2781