International Validation of a Dithiothreitol (DTT)-Based Method to Resolve the Daratumumab Interference with Blood Compatibility Testing

• Published in: Blood 2015-12, Vol.126 (23), p.3567-3567
• Main Authors: Chapuy, Claudia I, Aguad, Maria D, Nicholson, Rachel T, AuBuchon, James P, Cohn, Claudia S, Delaney, Meghan, Cid, Joan, Dzik, Walter, Fung, Mark K., Greinacher, Andreas, Ang, Ai Leen, Devine, Dana V., Dunbar, Nancy M, Garritsen, Henk, Goodnough, Lawrence T, Herron, Ross, Hervig, Tor A., Knudson, C. Michael, Kutner, Jose M, Nizzi, Frank, Pandey, Suchitra, Rioux-Masse, Benjamin, Selleng, Kathleen, Sweeney, Joseph, Takanashi, Minoko, Tobian, Aaron A.R., Wall, Lorna, Wendel, Silvano, Westerman, David A, Unger, Meredith, Doshi, Parul, Murphy, Michael F., Dumont, Larry J., Kaufman, Richard M., BEST Collaborative, The
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0006-4971; 1528-0020
• DOI: 10.1182/blood.V126.23.3567.3567

Introduction Daratumumab (DARA), an IgG1k human monoclonal antibody (Ab) against CD38, is a promising novel therapy for multiple myeloma. However, direct binding of DARA to endogenous CD38 on reagent red blood cells (RBCs) interferes with routine blood bank serologic testing. We recently showed that treating reagent RBCs with DTT eliminates the DARA interference by denaturing cell surface CD38, allowing the safe transfusion of patients on DARA.1 This multicenter international study was aimed at validating the DTT method for use by blood banks worldwide. Methods Participating blood banks received two plasma sample unknowns. Sample 1 was spiked with DARA alone (5 mcg/mL). Sample 2 was spiked with DARA plus a clinically significant RBC Ab (anti-D (Rh immune globulin) or monoclonal anti-Fya or anti-s). Sites were instructed to first perform an Ab screen using their usual method (tube, gel, or solid phase), then to repeat the Ab screen using DTT-treated RBCs (gel or tube). If the Ab screen remained positive with DTT-treated RBCs (Sample 2), sites were to identify the unknown Ab using a DTT-treated RBC panel (gel or tube.) The primary outcome measure was the proportion of sites able to successfully identify the unknown Ab in the presence of DARA. Qualitative data were collected by online survey. Results Paired plasma sample unknowns were shipped to 25 study sites in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia/New Zealand. Data were received from 23 sites to date (Table). For the initial Ab screen, 10 sites used tube testing, 7 sites used gel, and 6 sites used solid phase. All sites observed DARA interference with the Ab screen (false positive agglutination reactions). All sites reported no DARA interference using DTT-treated RBCs. For Ab identification (Sample 2), 13 sites used tube testing and 10 sites used gel. 23/23 sites (100%) were able to correctly identify the unknown Ab using the DTT method. The Abs identified were: anti-Fya (9/9), anti-s (8/8), and anti-D (6/6). Feedback on the DTT method was mainly positive, with 86% of sites that responded to the survey indicating that they planned to use the DTT method to manage clinical samples from DARA-treated patients. Conclusion DARA consistently interferes with all three Ab screening methods currently used by blood banks (tube, gel, and solid phase.) Using DTT-treated RBCs, 23/23 (100%) of blood bank laboratories from around the world were able to identify a clinically significant Ab initially mas