Loading…

Effects of System Control and Feedback Variability on Job Performance and Affective Reactions

The purpose of this research was to explore the effects of situational (system) control and feedback variability on work performance and affect. Forty-seven key-entry operators worked in a simulated work setting. The treatment conditions were arranged in a 3 x 2 factorial design with 3 levels of sys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human performance 1995-12, Vol.8 (4), p.297-325
Main Authors: Tatum, B. Charles, Nebeker, Delbert M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this research was to explore the effects of situational (system) control and feedback variability on work performance and affect. Forty-seven key-entry operators worked in a simulated work setting. The treatment conditions were arranged in a 3 x 2 factorial design with 3 levels of system control (speed-up, no change, and slow-down of a computer system) and 2 levels of feedback variability (low vs. high). System control was manipulated by changing software execution speed. The feedback vari- ability was manipulated by showing the workers computer-generated graphs of their performance that varied throughout the day. The results showed that the effects of system control and feedback variability on key entry performance depended on the achievement level (motivation) of the worker. The highly motivated workers (overachievers) improved their performance under inhibiting system control (slow computer speed) and high feedback variability. The low-motivation workers (underachievers) lowered their per- formance under inhibiting system controls and high feedback variability. As system control changed from inhibiting to facilitating, affective reactions (stress, frustration, and job dissatisfaction) diminished. Neither feedback variability nor motivation level was significantly related to these affective reactions. These findings are generally consistent with the literature on situational constraints (e.g., Peters & O'Connor, 1980) and total quality (e.g., Deming, 1986). with a few notable exceptions.
ISSN:0895-9285
1532-7043
DOI:10.1207/s15327043hup0804_3