Definitions of the Family: Professional and Personal Issues

INTRODUCTION In the field of family studies, many useful definitions of the family have been developed to meet the scholarly, professional, and policy needs of the past (Settles, 1987). Usually textbooks have begun with a review of such definitions and the authors often pick the definition they will...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marriage & family review 1999-07, Vol.28 (3-4), p.209-224
Main Author: Settles, Barbara H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Definitions
Dictionaries
Education
Families
Family
Family Research
Family Therapy
Home Economics
Language
Marriage and Family Education
Social Science Education
Social Science Research
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:INTRODUCTION In the field of family studies, many useful definitions of the family have been developed to meet the scholarly, professional, and policy needs of the past (Settles, 1987). Usually textbooks have begun with a review of such definitions and the authors often pick the definition they will support in their analysis of families. In research, the reports often specify how families were identified for the study or whether a stand-in for family such as household or house address was used. While it has been argued that households are functionally equivalent to families for the purposes of governmental data, this assumption is difficult to test as the data are not delineated to do this task. Many of our research reports on family are limited to family as seen by one member of the family or at most the perception of a dyad or two within the group. If there ever was a consensus on the definition of the family, it is not to be found in today's research and policy analysis. Whether the operational definitions, which have served us well for specific projects, should be or could be integrated or abstracted to produce a clear conceptual definition for the field at a theoretical level is under debate. The political and social consequences of conceptualizations of family are potent. For a complete reprint of this article contact Haworth Press by telephone (1-800-HAWORTH) or EMail (getinfo@haworthpressinc.com). Copies are available from: Haworth Document Delivery Center, The Haworth Press, Inc., 10 Alice Street, Binghamton, NY 13904-1580. Article copyright The Haworth Press, Inc.
ISSN:0149-4929
1540-9635
DOI:10.1300/J002v28n03_16