Loading…

Critical Care: Multicenter Treatment and Outcome Evaluation of Aspiration Syndromes in Critically III Patients

Background: Aspiration syndromes (pneumonia and pneumonitis) have significantly different processes. An evaluation of treatment and outcomes for these different syndromes has not been reported previously. Objective: To characterize and assess antimicrobial prescribing patterns for aspiration syndrom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Annals of pharmacotherapy 2007-04, Vol.41 (4), p.549-555
Main Authors: Kane-Gill, Sandra L, Olsen, Keith M, Rebuck, Jill A, Rea, Rhonda S, Boatwright, D Wesston, Smythe, Maureen A, Walker, Terrence R, Lager, Stephanie L, Hodgman, Tudy
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Aspiration syndromes (pneumonia and pneumonitis) have significantly different processes. An evaluation of treatment and outcomes for these different syndromes has not been reported previously. Objective: To characterize and assess antimicrobial prescribing patterns for aspiration syndromes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and describe outcomes of those patients. Methods: A retrospective, observational evaluation was conducted using a convenience sample of patients at 27 hospitals in North America; these patients were admitted to an adult ICU with a diagnosis of suspected/confirmed aspiration or had a suspected/confirmed aspiration while in the ICU. Hospital demographic, diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcome data were collected. Results: Over a 12 month period, 187 patients were observed. Aspiration syndromes included suspected aspiration (31%; n = 58), aspiration pneumonitis (12%; n = 23), aspiration pneumonia (55%; n = 103), and diagnosis not available (1.6%; n = 3). Antimicrobial management for the aspiration syndromes was as follows: suspected aspiration: 59% single agent, 38% multiple agents, and 3% no therapy; aspiration pneumonitis; 48% single agent, 39% multiple agents, and 13% no therapy; aspiration pneumonia: 48% single agent. 52% multiple agents, and 0% no therapy. Antimicrobial therapy was prescribed in patients with suspected (97%) and confirmed (100%) aspiration. Antibiotic therapy duration was significantly longer for aspiration pneumonia (9.1 ± 7.5 days) than for aspiration pneumonitis (5.2 ± 3.6 days; p = 0.013). Length of ICU stay was similar across patient groups. Conclusions: Antimicrobial agents are frequently prescribed to treat aspiration syndromes despite the lack of demonstrated efficacy for aspiration pneumonitis. Outcomes between aspiration syndromes were similar with the exception of duration of antibiotic treatment.
ISSN:1060-0280
1542-6270
DOI:10.1345/aph.1H675