Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results

Today most conclusions about cumulative knowledge in psychology are based on meta‐analysis. We first present an examination of the important statistical differences between fixed‐effects (FE) and random‐effects (RE) models in meta‐analysis and between two different RE procedures, due to Hedges and V...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of mathematical & statistical psychology 2009-02, Vol.62 (1), p.97-128
Main Authors: Schmidt, Frank L., Oh, In-Sue, Hayes, Theodore L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bias
Confidence Intervals
Differences
Humans
Mathematical Computing
Meta-analysis
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Models, Statistical
Psychology
Psychology - statistics & numerical data
Reproducibility of Results
Software
Statistics as Topic
Systematic review
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!