Periodontal Changes in Liver Cirrhosis and Post‐Transplantation Patients. I: Clinical Findings

• Published in: Journal of periodontology (1970) 2001-09, Vol.72 (9), p.1236-1240
• Main Authors: Oettinger‐Barak, Orit, Barak, Shlomi, Machtei, Eli E., Ardekian, Leon, Baruch, Yaacov, Peled, Micha
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis of Variance; Cross‐sectional studies; cyclosporin A/adverse effects; Cyclosporine - adverse effects; Female; Gingival Hyperplasia - etiology; Humans; immunosuppression; Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects; liver cirrhosis; Liver Cirrhosis - complications; liver transplantation; Liver Transplantation - adverse effects; Male; Middle Aged; Statistics, Nonparametric; Tacrolimus - adverse effects
• ISSN: 0022-3492; 1943-3670
• DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1236

Background: Cyclosporin A (CsA) is widely used to prevent liver transplantation failure. CsA‐induced gingival overgrowth is a common side effect. However, the effect of cirrhotic liver disease, liver transplantation, and immunosuppressive therapy on the periodontium is yet unclear. The aim of the present cross‐sectional study was to examine the effect of liver cirrhosis, transplantation, and immunosuppressive therapy on the periodontium. Methods: The experimental group (LC) consisted of 13 liver cirrhosis patients. A second experimental group (PT) included 24 patients, post‐liver transplantation, receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Seventeen healthy subjects formed a control group. The Ramfjord index teeth were recorded for plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival overgrowth (GO). Results: Mean PI and mean GI for the LC, PT, and C groups were not statistically different (P >0.05). Mean PD for the LC (3.32 ± 0.24 mm) and PT group (3.41 ± 0.13 mm) was significantly higher (P = 0.0001, ANOVA) compared to the C group (2.45 ± 0.16 mm). Likewise, CAL for the LC (4.89 ± 0.47 mm) and PT group (4.68 ± 0.47 mm) was significantly higher (P = 0.001, ANOVA) than the C group (2.78 ± 0.23 mm). Patients in the PT group exhibited the greatest mean GO scores (0.88 ± 0.09) compared to the LC group (0.37 ± 0.07) and the C group (0.09 ± 0.02). All 3 groups were significantly different from each other (P = 0.0001) despite great variability within the groups. GO in the CsA‐treated patients (1.1 ± 0.09) was significantly higher (P = 0.0001) than in those treated with tacrolimus (0.57 ± 0.1). Conclusions: Liver cirrhosis patients demonstrated greater pocketing and attachment loss compared to healthy matched controls. These same differences were observed in patients post‐transplantation. Gingival overgrowth occurred as a result of the immunosuppressive therapy with CsA, while to a lesser degree with tacrolimus. Replacement of CsA by tacrolimus in patients manifesting gingival overgrowth might be recommended whenever possible to overcome this problem. J Periodontol 2001;72:1236‐1240.