Loading…

Mechanical Harvesting and Irrigation Strategy Responses on ‘Arbequina’ Olive Oil Quality

This study describes the effects of mechanical harvesting and irrigation on quality in ‘Arbequina’ olive oil ( Olea europaea L.). Irrigation treatments included a control, deficit irrigation (DI) during pit hardening, and subsurface deficit irrigation (SDI). Results showed that mechanical harvesting...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.) Va.), 2018-10, Vol.28 (5), p.607-614
Main Authors: Rufat, Josep, Romero-Aroca, Agustí J., Arbonés, Amadeu, Villar, Josep M., Hermoso, Juan F., Pascual, Miquel
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study describes the effects of mechanical harvesting and irrigation on quality in ‘Arbequina’ olive oil ( Olea europaea L.). Irrigation treatments included a control, deficit irrigation (DI) during pit hardening, and subsurface deficit irrigation (SDI). Results showed that mechanical harvesting damaged the olives and reduced olive oil quality by increasing free fatty acids (FFAs) and peroxide value, and by decreasing fruitiness, stability, bitterness, and pungency. DI resulted in increased fruit dry weight and oil content, which could be explained by their reduced crop load (9.3% of crop reduction for DI and 23.9% for SDI). DI did not affect olive oil characteristics, whereas SDI increased stability, fruitiness, and bitterness, and decreased polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFAs). In conclusion, mechanical harvesting tended to damage the fruit, resulting in lower quality olive oil, the DI strategy neither affected fruit nor olive oil characteristics, whereas the SDI strategy positively affected oil quality when greater water restrictions were applied.
ISSN:1063-0198
1943-7714
DOI:10.21273/HORTTECH04016-18