Accuracy of Fitbit Charge 4, Garmin Vivosmart 4, and WHOOP Versus Polysomnography: Systematic Review

Despite being the gold-standard method for objectively assessing sleep, polysomnography (PSG) faces several limitations as it is expensive, time-consuming, and labor-intensive; requires various equipment and technical expertise; and is impractical for long-term or in-home use. Consumer wrist-worn we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2024-03, Vol.12, p.e52192-e52192
Main Authors: Schyvens, An-Marie, Van Oost, Nina Catharina, Aerts, Jean-Marie, Masci, Federica, Peters, Brent, Neven, An, Dirix, Hélène, Wets, Geert, Ross, Veerle, Verbraecken, Johan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accelerometers
Accuracy
Agreements
Eye movements
Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers
Heart rate
Humans
Literature reviews
mHealth for Data Collection and Research
Polysomnography - instrumentation
Polysomnography - methods
Quality of life
REM sleep
Review
Sensors
Sleep
Sleep Monitoring, Sleep Quality, Sleep Disorders
Systematic review
Validation studies
Wearable computers
Wearable Devices and Sensors
Wearable Electronic Devices - standards
Wearable Electronic Devices - statistics & numerical data
Wearables and MHealth Reviews
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!