Analyses of Johannes Kepler’s Sunspot Drawings in 1607: A Revised Scenario for the Solar Cycles in the Early 17th Century

• Published in: Astrophysical journal. Letters 2024-08, Vol.970 (2), p.L31
• Main Authors: Hayakawa, Hisashi, Murata, Koji, Teague, E. Thomas H., Bechet, Sabrina, Sôma, Mitsuru
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Carbon 14; Equator; Extreme values; Maunder minimum; Solar cycle; Solar minimum; Solar observations; Solar-terrestrial interactions; Sunspot cycle; Sunspot groups; Sunspots
• ISSN: 2041-8205; 2041-8213
• DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad57c9

Telescopic sunspot observations began in 1610 and captured subsequent solar cycles. In combination with proxy reconstructions on an annual scale, these data sets indicate a gradual transition between regular solar cycles and the Maunder Minimum. The telescopic sunspot observations missed the beginning of the first telescopic solar cycle (Solar Cycle −13), leaving room for considerable uncertainty as to its temporal evolution. Before these early telescopic observations, however, Kepler made solar observations using camerae obscurae and recorded a sunspot group in three solar drawings in 1607. Here, we make use of Kepler’s sunspot drawings and descriptive texts to identify his observational sites and time stamps. We have deprojected his sunspot drawings and compared the reported positions with our calculations of the inclination of the solar equator as seen from these sites at that time. These results locate the reported sunspot group near the solar equator eastward from the central meridian. This contrasts with telescopic sunspot drawings from the 1610s that show sunspot groups in the higher heliographic latitudes. Therefore, what Kepler saw was probably a sunspot group from Solar Cycle −14, rather than one from Solar Cycle −13. These records allow us to place the beginning of Solar Cycle −13 between 1607 and 1610. In comparison with the 14 C-based solar-cycle reconstructions, our result supports regular solar-cycle durations around the 1610s, rather than any suggested extreme extensions of the solar-cycle duration(s) around the 1610s.