Loading…
Inhibition of multiplication of herpes simplex virus by caffeic acid
Hot water extracts of coffee grinds and commercial instant coffee solutions have been shown to exhibit marked antiviral and virucidal activities against herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Specifically, it has been shown that caffeine and N-methyl-pyridinium formate inhibit the multiplication of HS...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of molecular medicine 2011-10, Vol.28 (4), p.595-598 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Hot water extracts of coffee grinds and commercial instant coffee solutions
have been shown to exhibit marked antiviral and virucidal activities against herpes
simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Specifically, it has been shown that caffeine and
N-methyl-pyridinium formate inhibit the multiplication of HSV-1 in HEp-2 cells.
The present study examined the virological properties and the antiviral activity
of caffeic acid against HSV-1. Caffeic acid inhibited the multiplication of HSV-1
in vitro, while chlorogenic acid, a caffeic acid ester with quinic acid, did not.
These reagents did not have a direct virucidal effect. The one-step growth curve
of HSV-1 showed that the addition of caffeic acid at 8 h post infection (h p.i.)
did not significantly affect the formation of progeny viruses. An analysis of
the influence of the time of caffeic acid addition, revealed that addition at
an early time post infection remarkably inhibited the formation of progeny infectious
virus in the infected cells, but its addition after 6 h p.i. (i.e., the time of
the completion of viral genome replication) did not efficiently inhibit this process.
These results indicate that caffeic acid inhibits HSV-1 multiplication mainly
before the completion of viral DNA replication, but not thereafter. Although caffeic
acid showed some cytotoxicity by prolonged incubation, the observed antiviral
activity is likely not the secondary result of the cytotoxic effect of the reagent,
because the inhibition of the virus multiplication was observed before appearance
of the notable cytotoxicity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1107-3756 1791-244X |
DOI: | 10.3892/ijmm.2011.739 |