Estimating storm erosion with a rainfall simulator

• Published in: Canadian journal of soil science 1997-11, Vol.77 (4), p.669-676
• Main Authors: Nolan, S. C., Vliet, L. J. P. van, Goddard, T. W., Flesch, T. K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0008-4271; 1918-1841
• DOI: 10.4141/S96-079

Interpreting soil loss from rainfall simulators is complicated by the uncertain relationship between simulated and natural rainstorms. Our objective was to develop and test a method for estimating soil loss from natural rainfall using a portable rainfall simulator (1 m 2 plot size). Soil loss from 12 rainstorms was measured on 144-m 2 plots with barley residue in conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT) and zero tillage (ZT) conditions. A corresponding "simulated" soil loss was calculated by matching the simulator erosivity to each storm's erosivity. High (140 mm h −1 ) and low (60 mm h −1 ) simulation intensities were examined. The best agreement between simulated and natural soil loss occurred using the low intensity, after making three adjustments. The first was to compensate for the 38% lower kinetic energy of the simulator compared with natural rain. The second was for the smaller slope length of the simulator plot. The third was to begin calculating simulator erosivity only after runoff began. After these adjustments, the simulated soil loss over all storms was 99% of the natural soil loss for CT, 112% for RT and 95% for ZT. Our results show that rainfall simulators can successfully estimate soil loss from natural rainfall events. Key words: Natural rainfall events, simulated rainfall, erosivity, tillage