Loading…

Removal of copper(II) and nickel(II) ions from aqueous solution using non-living lichen Ramalina fraxinea biomass: investigation of kinetics and sorption isotherms

Studies in the field of heavy metal ion removal from industrial wastewater using biomass are increasing in number due to highly efficient and cost-effective applications. In this study, we report the use of non-living lichen, Ramalina fraxinea, as a biosorbent for the removal of Cu(II) and Ni(II) io...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Desalination and water treatment 2017-05, Vol.75, p.148-157
Main Authors: Candan, Mehmet, Tay, Funda, Avan, Ilker, Tay, Turgay
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Studies in the field of heavy metal ion removal from industrial wastewater using biomass are increasing in number due to highly efficient and cost-effective applications. In this study, we report the use of non-living lichen, Ramalina fraxinea, as a biosorbent for the removal of Cu(II) and Ni(II) ions from aqueous solution. The biosorption of Cu(II) and Ni(II) ions from aqueous solution by R. fraxinea biomass is investigated in a batch system for parameters such as pH, contact time, and initial concentrations of metal ions. The kinetic data of the biosorption process is evaluated with pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order and intraparticle diffusion kinetic models. The experimental data shows greater accordance with the pseudo-second-order model for the tested ions. The equilibrium data of Cu(II) and Ni(II) ions biosorption fitted onto both the Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption models. The highest sorption capacities of Cu(II) and Ni(II) ions by the R. fraxinea biomass are found to be 43.48 and 9.71 mg/g, respectively. The biosorption studies indicate that R. fraxinea biomass is a moderate biosorbent for the removal of Cu(II) and Ni(II) ions from aqueous solutions compared with other biosorbents.
ISSN:1944-3986
DOI:10.5004/dwt.2017.20749