Know your customer: Unravelling the challenges

• Published in: Journal of payments strategy & systems 2024-01, Vol.18 (1), p.30-38
• Main Authors: von Haenisch, Hans-Joachim, Egner, Thomas
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aml; Anti-Money Laundering; Anti-Money Laundering Regulation; European Business Registers; Financial Crime Compliance; Harmonisation Of Regulations; Know-Your-Customer; Kyc; Politically Exposed Person; Ultimate Beneficial Owner
• ISSN: 1750-1806; 1750-1814; 1750-1814
• DOI: 10.69554/KLRO4841

Regulated financial institutions must conduct regular know-your-customer (KYC) reviews on corporate clients to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorism. However, national add-on requirements and regulatory discrepancies challenge the vision of a unified Europe, hindering the creation of an efficient, digital and hence scalable pan-European anti-money laundering (AML) process for all stakeholders who are active beyond their national borders. The current inability of banks to introduce efficient but robust pan- European KYC processes delays customers' access to finance and other banking products, and indirectly impedes the free movement of goods, services and capital. The European Commission plans to introduce the Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (AMLR) to harmonise and strengthen the EU AML framework. This could reduce national divergences, allowing for a level playing field across the internal market and consistent application of provisions throughout the EU. Unfortunately, harmonised regulation alone does not solve the current issues faced by financial institutions. While a harmonised rulebook provides certainty related to 'what' needs to be done, significant pan-European discrepancies remain related to 'how' the requirements can be fulfilled. For example, the EU has directed all member states to establish commercial and beneficial ownership registers, but left the design of such registers under the authority of the member state. Consequently, banks active on a pan-European level have to adjust their processes based on the type and content of the national register. Also, the definition of what constitutes a politically exposed person (PEP) varies significantly across the EU, as do the enhanced due diligence requirements which are triggered upon the identification of such a PEP. This paper provides suggestions on how EU member states can help the financial industry in a joint effort to prevent money laundering and combat the financing of terrorism more effectively. The objective of this discussion is to create a streamlined and unified approach to KYC processes across Europe.